Legal Opinion

People v. Fairchild

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1967No. Crim. 6031PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a trial by jury, of a violation of Penal Code section 667 1 (petty theft after conviction of a felony). 2 His contentions on appeal are as follows: (1) the trial court erroneously declared a mistrial in defendant’s first trial; (2) the trial court erroneously accepted defendant’s admission of a prior conviction; (3) the form of verdict was improper and misleading to the jury; (4) the jury instructions and admonitions were improper in several respects; (5) the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a photograph of defendant; (6)…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. HeishmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. HatcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API