Barth v. Barth
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} The Eighth District Court of Appeals has certified this case pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution and App.R. 25. The Eighth District Court of Appeals found its judgment to be in conflict with the judgments of the Second District Court of Appeals in McMaken v. McMaken (1994), 96 Ohio App.3d 402, 645 N.E.2d 113, and the Sixth District Court of Appeals in Heath v. Heath (Mar. 7, 1997), Lucas App. No. L-96-288, 1997 WL 103832.
{¶ 2} The certified issue is “[wjhether the six-month residency requirement for jurisdiction set forth in R.C. 3105.03 is a strict test or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Lake Hospital System, Inc. v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Wingate v. HordgeOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Thompson Electric, Inc. v. Bank OneOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Iddings v. Board of Education of Jefferson CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bedford v. BradberryOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Davis v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Prouse, Dash & Crouch, L.L.P. v. DiMarcoOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Barth v. BarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012