Wingate v. Hordge
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The sole question presented in the cause at bar is whether the owner of a P.O.D. savings account, opened pursuant to R. C. 2131.10, may designate more than one person as a beneficiary of the account.
Appellant contends that R. C. 2131.10 unambiguously limits depositors of P.O.D. accounts to only one beneficiary for each account. Alternately, appellant asserts that when R. C. 2131.10 is read in context and in pari materia with the interpretive guidelines set forth in R. C. 1.41 through 1.43,1 it becomes evident the words “person” and “beneficiary” as used in the statute include only the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. BollarOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Hulsmeyer v. Hospice of Southwest Ohio, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Wilson v. Lawrence (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State ex rel. Fenley v. Ohio Historical SocietyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. D.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.