Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*292¶1 The common enemy rule, which allows landowners to repel surface waters to the detriment of their neighbors, does not apply when the landowner obstructs a watercourse or natural drainway or when the landowner obstructs riparian water from entering a flood channel. Currens v. Sleek, 138 Wn.2d 858, 862-63, 983 P.2d 626, 993 P.2d 900 (1999); Sund v. Keating, 43 Wn.2d 36, 42-43, 259 P.2d 1113 (1953). Landowners appeal summary dismissal of their inverse condemnation claim. They claim that a dike owned, constructed, maintained, and modified by government entities blocked side channels through…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Martin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2010