Legal Opinion

Harland v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Liim Circuit Court. — Hon. Fred Lamb, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

TEIMB'LE, J. —

Suit on a policy of fire insurance for $900 on a stock of undertaker’s goods. The case was tried before the court without a jury. Plaintiff recovered judgment for the amount of the policy and defendant appeals.

Defendant set up that the policy was void because of plaintiff’s fraud in the matter of the issuance thereof and in having the goods insured for that amount.

*200Plaintiff was defendant’s agent in the town of Bucldin. He bought the stock in controversy at administrator’s sale for $425 or $450. He was one of the appraisers who had appraised the stock for the administrator, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New-York Central Ins. Co. v. . National Protection Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Kern v. Supreme Council, American Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Ramspeck v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance v. Turnbull & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  5. Arispe Mercantile Co. v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Block v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Gamel v. Continental Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Hawkeye Clay Works v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Pauley v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API