Legal Opinion

Arispe Mercantile Co. v. Capital Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1907PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Union District Court.— IIon. H. X. Evans, Judge. The opinion states the ease.—

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, C. J.—

This is an action at law for the recovery of damages upon a policy of fire insurance. At the close of the evidence the trial court sustained a motion for a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The motion was based upon the following grounds: (1) That the policy had been forfeited by the act or sufferance of the insured in allowing a mechanic’s lien to be placed upon the insured building; (2) that the plaintiff had forfeited its right to recover by presenting false and fraudulent proofs of loss; and (3) that the defendant’s agent who issued the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. New-York Central Ins. Co. v. . National Protection Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. McKenzieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  4. Empire State Insurance v. American Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance v. Turnbull & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stroh v. O'HearnMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nertney v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Rogers v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Salene v. Queen City Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Detroit & Northern Michigan Building & Loan Ass'n v. OramMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API