Gamel v. Continental Insurance Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in the amount of $10,000.00 and costs entered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant. The determinative issue is whether a statement by the plaintiff to defendant’s agent to the effect he wanted a policy for $10,000.00 can constitute a fraudulent misrepresentation. If it can then a disputed issue of fact prohibiting the entry of a summary judgment exists. Civil Rule 74.04, V.A.M.R. If, as a matter of law, it cannot then the judgment was properly entered. We are to consider that issue in the light of the provisions of §…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Poe v. Illinois Cent. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Daggs v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Orlann v. LaederichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Wood v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Duckworth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- United States v. David F. Brown, Tore T. Debella, Richard A. Reizen, Robert F. EhrlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Wells v. Missouri Property Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Fairmont Foods Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Levin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.