Legal Opinion

Gamel v. Continental Insurance Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1971No. 33737PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in the amount of $10,000.00 and costs entered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant. The determinative issue is whether a statement by the plaintiff to defendant’s agent to the effect he wanted a policy for $10,000.00 can constitute a fraudulent misrepresentation. If it can then a disputed issue of fact prohibiting the entry of a summary judgment exists. Civil Rule 74.04, V.A.M.R. If, as a matter of law, it cannot then the judgment was properly entered. We are to consider that issue in the light of the provisions of §…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Poe v. Illinois Cent. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Daggs v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Orlann v. LaederichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Wood v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Duckworth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. United States v. David F. Brown, Tore T. Debella, Richard A. Reizen, Robert F. EhrlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Wells v. Missouri Property Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Fairmont Foods Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Levin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API