Legal Opinion

Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Fernandez

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2000No. 99-2265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Absent mitigating circumstances, an indefinite suspension from the practice of law is an appropriate sanction when an attorney engages in a pattern of neglect involving multiple clients and refuses to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigations. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 219, 221, 718 N.E.2d 1277, 1279. No mitigating factors are evident that would warrant a lesser sanction for respondent’s reprehensible conduct here. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KieftOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. KieftOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. PaulsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API