Legal Opinion
Carlisle Packing Co. v. Deming
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1911No. 9208PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, J., entered June 13, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $12,955, upon a claim growing out of an alleged breach of contract for the purchase of certain canned salmon of the pack of 1907. The essential allegations of the complaint are as follows:
“That on or about the......■ day of........., 1907, the defendant E. B. Deming, acting for himself and his co-defendants, entered into a contract with this plaintiff for the purchase of all of the salmon fish packed and to be packed by this plaintiff for the season of 1907; that said agreement was that the said defendants would purchase from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Goupille v. ChaputWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Maitland v. PurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Ex parte Lowman & Hanford Stationery & Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by10 opinions
- Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Pearson v. Arlington Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Gatudy v. Acme Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
- Garcia & Maggini Co. v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Maher & Co. v. FarnandisWashington Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.