Legal Opinion

Goupille v. Chaput

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1906No. 6098PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered September 14, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

The complaint in this case alleges, that in the month of January, 1901, the, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement whereby the defendant agreed that, if the plaintiff would pay to- defendant all the money that the plaintiff should earn in America, he would keep the same as trustee for the use and benefit of plaintiff, and would pay to her on demand, and would, when required by plaintiff, account to her for all moneys soi paid to him up to the time of such demands; that between the 26th day of January, 1901, and the 31st day of August, 1902, the plaintiff paid to the defendant the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Husted v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Van Doren Roofing & Cornice Co. v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Carlisle Packing Co. v. DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Gatudy v. Acme Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Maitland v. PurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API