Maher & Co. v. Farnandis
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered September 12, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a subcontractor’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The defendant Farnandis had a contract with the defendant Cascade Investment Company, a corporation, whereby he agreed to do the excavating and construct a building for it upon certain of its property in the city of Seattle. He thereafter sublet the excavating work to the defendant Carter, and agreed to pay him eighty cents per cubic yard therefor. Thereafter Carter sublet the work to plaintiff’s assignor, who did the excavating at an agreed price of seventy-five cents per cubic yard. In due time the latter filed a notice of a claim of lien against the property, and before the commencement of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Newton v. RebenackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Biegler v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Installment Building & Loan Co. v. WentworthWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Carlisle Packing Co. v. DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seventh Elect Church v. First Seattle Dexter Horton National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Huxtable v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Reser v. LabudeWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Miller v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Union Central Life Insurance v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.