Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge
In this appeal following a remand by this court to the district court, appellant public utilities commission argues that the district court erred by (1) concluding that it is not a political subdivision of the state entitled to a lower preverdict interest rate under Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(c)(1)(i); and (2) declining to grant a collateral-source offset for workers’ compensation benefits paid to the injured respondent. We affirm the district court’s collateral-source decision, but reverse the award of preverdict interest at the rate of ten percent per year and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Ashley Josie v. City of Princeton and Princeton Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- City of Baxter v. City of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019