Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 2017No. A16-1737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge

In this appeal following a remand by this court to the district court, appellant public utilities commission argues that the district court erred by (1) concluding that it is not a political subdivision of the state entitled to a lower preverdict interest rate under Minn. Stat. § 549.09, subd. 1(c)(1)(i); and (2) declining to grant a collateral-source offset for workers’ compensation benefits paid to the injured respondent. We affirm the district court’s collateral-source decision, but reverse the award of preverdict interest at the rate of ten percent per year and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  2. State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Ashley Josie v. City of Princeton and Princeton Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
  4. City of Baxter v. City of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API