Legal Opinion

Huffy Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 9, 1990No. Court No. 83-12-01795Published

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Chief Judge:

The question in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported *4from the Republic of Korea, and described on the customs invoices as “outer casings” and “inner tubes,” for bicycle tires.

The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service under separate items of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). The “outer casings” were classified as “[p]neumatic tires: * * * [b]icycle,” under item 772.48, TSUS, with duty at the rate of 5 per centum ad valorem. The “inner tubes” were classified as “[t]ubes:…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API