Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United City of Yorkville v. SUGAR GROVE

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 24, 2007No. 2-06-0649PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

Defendant, the Village of Sugar Grove (Sugar Grove), negotiated two independent jurisdictional boundary line agreements, one with plaintiff the United City of Yorkville (Yorkville) and one with the Village of Montgomery (Montgomery). Yorkville and Montgomery do not have a boundary line agreement, and Montgomery is not a party to this action. Sugar Grove, which is in Kane County, is north of Yorkville, which is in Kendall County. Montgomery, which is in Du Page County, is east of Sugar Grove and Yorkville.

In general, the agreements barred the respective parties from attempting to annex land…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bonaguro v. the County Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Caveney v. BowerIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Rivard v. Chicago Fire Fighters Union, Local No. 2Illinois Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deicke Center v. Illinois Health Facilities Planning BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Kole v. Village of NorridgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API