Legal Opinion

Caveney v. Bower

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2003No. 92963PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Plaintiffs, Jack and Margaret Caveney, are shareholders in Panduit Corporation. For the tax years ending December 31, 1993, 1994, and 1995, Panduit elected to be treated as a subchapter S corporation for federal and state tax purposes. During the tax years in question, plaintiffs claimed a credit against their Illinois income tax liability, pursuant to section 201(k) of the Illinois Income Tax Act (the Act) (35 ILCS 5/20l(k) (West 1996)), for research and development expenditures incurred by Panduit. The State disallowed the claims and calculated back taxes and interest in the amount of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. First of America Trust Co. v. ArmsteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Carl E. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Sullivan v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Allegis Realty Investors v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. John Doe A. v. Diocese of DallasIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. WoodrumIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API