Legal Opinion

Gornall v. Sadwin (In Re Sadwin)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided April 16, 1980No. Bankruptcy 78-1270 T, 78-1271 TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION DETERMINING DISCHARGE-ABILITY

ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bankruptcy Judge.

When man bites dog, that is news. When dog bites man, it is not news unless the victim of the bite is a veterinarian and he is bitten by his patient. This is not unusual either and would not be noteworthy by itself except where the owner of the patient is sued by the veterinarian. That is not only news, but no doubt adds an unusual twist to an old but not otherwise very interesting encounter between man and beast.

At this point one should wonder what this has to do…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Yackel v. NysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Humphreys v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quezada v. QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Norm Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. v. Peterson (In Re Peterson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
  3. Gornall v. Sadwin (In Re Sadwin)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1981
  4. Kelt v. QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. In re GroomeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API