Legal Opinion
Norm Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. v. Peterson (In Re Peterson)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 15, 2005No. 17-12824PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PETER J. WALSH, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiffs Norman Gershman and Norm Gershman’s Things to Wear, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment (Adv.Doc. # 7) with respect to their adversary complaint which requests a determination that the debt owed to them by the debtor Jennifer Ruth Peterson is nondischargeable. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment will be denied.
BACKGROUND
On August 31, 2004, Jennifer Ruth Peterson filed a voluntary petition under chapter 7 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et. seq. (the “Bankruptcy…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beard Research, Inc. v. Kates (In re Kates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sherwin Williams Co. v. Grasso (In re Grasso)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Cochran v. Reath (In Re Reath)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Knowles v. McGuckin (In Re McGuckin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Kay Berry, Inc. v. Pearman (In Re Pearman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.