Legal Opinion

Kelt v. Quezada

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1983No. 83-3121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Circuit Judge:

The creditor-plaintiff, Kelt, filed a complaint in the bankruptcy proceedings of the debtors Quezada to determine the dischargeability of his state-court judgment against the Quezadas. The damages awarded were for injuries inflicted by a pit bulldog owned by the Quezadas. The plaintiff appeals from the determination of the bankruptcy court, affirmed by the district court, that the debt was discharged.

The plaintiff Kelt contends that the debtors-bankrupts’ conduct in harboring in a *122crowded neighborhood a vicious dog, known to have previously bitten another person, resulted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Rines v. Harris (In Re Rines)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1982
  3. Yackel v. NysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Humphreys v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Gornall v. Sadwin (In Re Sadwin)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quezada v. QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Thatcher v. Austin (In Re Austin)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API