In re Groome
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
In Bankruptcy. Sur rule upon petition of William T. Carter to show cause why the adjudication in bankruptcy should not be set aside, etc.
1Opinion of the CourtAcheson, J.
On the ninth day of February, 1880, William T. Carter, a creditor of Samuel W. Groome, the bankrupt, presented his petition, in which, after averring that it was the duty of the said Groome to cause notice of his adjudication in bankruptcy to be served on the petitioner through the marshal, he alleges that “no such notice, however, was *465received by the petitioner, ñor, as far as he has been able to learn, was any such mailed or otherwise sent to him, although the residence of the petitioner was well known to said Samuel W. Groome at and before the presentation of the said Groome’s petition in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Smith v. KernochenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Van Lott, Inc. v. Wittenberg (In Re Collins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1980
- Gornall v. Sadwin (In Re Sadwin)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1980
- Matter of North American Acceptance Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.