Legal Opinion

McLean v. Mooser

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1922No. Civ. No. 4238PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This appeal is taken by the defendants from a judgment against them in an action upon a promissory note for $1,598, signed by them jointly, payable to Messrs. Dudley and McLean and by them assigned to plaintiff.

The complaint was the usual one to recover upon a promissory note. The answer alleged that at the time of the execution of said note it was secured by a pledge of certain jewels; that the original payees of the note sold said jewels ■for a sum in excess of the amount of the note and have refused to account to defendants for the- sale or to pay over the surplus to defendants; that no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Moran v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sands v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cooper v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API