Barton v. The Procter & Gamble Company
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLISON BARTON and JANA Case No.: 3:24-CV-01332-GPC-SBC MORENO, individually and on behalf of 12 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS 14 v. 15 [ECF No. 33] THE PROCTER & GAMBLE 16 COMPANY, a Delaware company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 This class action suit involves a number of consumer protection claims against 20 Defendant for allegedly misleading consumers regarding the safety of its tampon 21 products. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.