Legal Opinion

Barton v. The Procter & Gamble Company

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 8, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01332Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLISON BARTON and JANA Case No.: 3:24-CV-01332-GPC-SBC MORENO, individually and on behalf of 12 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS 14 v. 15 [ECF No. 33] THE PROCTER & GAMBLE 16 COMPANY, a Delaware company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 This class action suit involves a number of consumer protection claims against 20 Defendant for allegedly misleading consumers regarding the safety of its tampon 21 products. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API