Mahoney v. Hartford Investment Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover for alleged extra plumbing work and material, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Shumway, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
This action was brought on the common counts to recover for extra plumbing work and materials alleged to have been furnished and rendered by the plaintiffs to the defendant, in connection with the reconstruction of a building, now known as the Hotel Garde, .in the city of Hartford.
The appeal is largely based upon an attempt to retry, before this court, questions of fact settled in the court below; the defendant contending that many of the conclusions of the trial court are not warranted by the evidence, which is before us under the provisions of § 797 of the General Statutes, and we are asked…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Pew v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- O'Keefe v. Corporation of St. Francis's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Community Collaborative of Bridgeport, Inc. v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Wexler Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- State v. BuonomoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.