Legal Opinion

Cardinal v. Houghton County Street Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1911No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Hougnton; Streeter, J. Case by Dolphis Cardinal against the Houghton County Street Railway Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for injuries claimed to have been negligently inflicted upon him by defendant in the operation of one oi its cars. A part of defendant’s street railway runs from Red Jacket to Houghton. This electric road, in going from the former to the latter place, passes through the village of Laurium along Lake Linden avenue to Florida street, which joins Lake Linden avenue at about a right angle. The car tracks turn into Florida street on a curve and continue on said street towards Houghton. Along these streets the line is double tracked, running on each…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGee v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gardner v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bennett v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Weil v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cardinal v. Houghton County Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Deland v. Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. MacDearmid v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API