Legal Opinion

MacDearmid v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1921No. Docket No. 115Published

Error to Wayne; Des Voignes (L. Burget), J., presiding. Case by John D. MacDearmid against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff in the night attempted to cross from the north to the south side of Fort street in Detroit. There the street car tracks of defendant were double. When within 8 or 4 feet of the north tracks plaintiff stopped, as he claims, while a westbound car passed. He then observed an east-bound passenger car on the south track about 1% blocks- to the west. After the west-bound car had passed rapidly, plaintiff started across the tracks. He said the car had passed him about 20 feet when he started. Before reaching the south tracks he looked again for the east-bound passenger car, and saw it, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cardinal v. Houghton County Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API