Legal Opinion
United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1957No. Civ. 17186PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
This appeal involves the validity of proceedings by which the city of Hayward sought to annex territory designated as Treeview Annex. The annexation proceedings were commenced under the Annexation Act of 1913 (Gov. Code, §§ 35100-35158). After protest hearing an election was called. Before the election, a petition for writs of mandamus and of review was filed. After trial, the annexation proceedings were found invalid, and peremptory writ of mandate issued, terminating the annexation. Council and city appeal.
The basis of the trial court’s action was its determination that substantial and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- People Ex Rel. City of Pasadena v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Port Hueneme v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Tillie Lewis Foods, Inc. v. City of PittsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Meyers v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- City of Costa Mesa v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.