Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Local Agency Formation Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1973No. Civ. 1509PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
The plaintiffs, Robert K. Meyers, Pearl Meyers, R. C. Thiebaud, Robert M. Riesner, Lois M. Riesner, R. Earl Ruddy, Jr., and Wilda Ruddy (hereinafter referred to as “appellants”), are residents of areas proposed to be annexed by the City of Visalia (hereinafter “City”) under the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 1 (Gov. Code, §§ 35300-35326; hereinafter referred to as the “1939 Act”). 2
The appellants appeal from the denial of a petition for administrative mandamus, filed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, seeking to annul two…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Thompson v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Bekiaris v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simi Valley Recreation & Park District v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 9 v. Spokane County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Tillie Lewis Foods, Inc. v. City of PittsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Bookout v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Fig Garden Park No. 2 Ass'n v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.