Legal Opinion

Adams v. FedAlaska Federal Credit Union

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1988No. S-2018PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This case raises issues concerning collection on a note secured by a second deed of trust.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In April 1983, Virginia Adams signed a promissory note in favor of FedAlaska Federal Credit Union (FedAlaska) for $36,250 plus interest. Concurrently, as security for the loan, Adams signed a deed of trust naming FedAlaska beneficiary. The deed of trust was a second deed of trust on the property. This loan was purportedly for property renovation, but that renovation was never completed. In 1985 FedAlaska advanced an additional $19,939.12 to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beal Bank, SSB v. SarichWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bibi v. ElfrinkAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Alaska Teamster-Employer Pension Trust v. Wise (In Re Wise)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1990
  4. Mark Thomas v. Joseph P. Casteel TrustAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Adams v. FedAlaska Federal Credit UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API