Legal Opinion
Witter v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 4, 1933No. 41670PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
— Victor J. Silliman Company, Inc., is a corporation with its principal place of business at Des Moines, Iowa, and was registered as a dealer -under the provisions of chapter 10 of the Acts of the Forty-third General Assembly. In compliance with the provisions of chapter 10 of the Acts of the Forty-third General Assembly, Victor J. Silliman Company, Inc., delivered to the secretary of state a bond executed by it as principal, and the Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company as surety, in the penal sum of $5,000. The said bond was given in compliance with the statute, section 8581-cl4, 1931…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bailey v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Leggett v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- National Surety Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Merrinane v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Bill Curphy Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Municipal Bond & Investment Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Wiggins v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.