Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. Pacific Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1933No. Docket No. 9006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff Wiggins commenced an action against the Pacific Indemnity Company and others to recover the sum of $2,150 with interest for moneys paid to the Homeway Realty Company, a copartnership composed of Weygint and Gillette. The surety company at the time of answering the complaint filed a cross-complaint against plaintiff Wiggins and cross-defendants named herein in which it was alleged that the surety company had executed and delivered to the Homeway Realty Company two bonds in the principal sum of $2,000 each in compliance with the terms of the California Real Estate Act (Stats.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In Re WeisbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Milliron v. DittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Redman v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Western Surety Company v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API