Legal Opinion

Jost v. King

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1913No. S.F. No. 6110Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered after the sustaining of defendant’s demurrer to the complaint and plaintiff’s refusal to amend.

The complaint contains allegations that King was at all times mentioned therein a supervisor of the county of So-, noma; that the plaintiff “was in possession and entitled to sell and dispose of” a certain described tract of land in that county; and that on June 10, 1910, by a unanimous vote of the board of supervisors of Sonoma County a certain resplution was passed. The resolution is then fully pleaded as follows:

“Whereas, it appears to be a public…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. County of San Luis Obispo v. FarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Paola Gas Co. v. Paola Glass Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. Witmer Bros. v. WeidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API