Legal Opinion

Eggert v. Schumacher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1933No. 24168. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal results from an order granting a new trial in a case growing out of an automobile collision, tried to the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the testimony for respondent, appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and moved for a nonsuit; which challenge and motion were granted. Later, upon motion for a new trial, the trial court reversed its decision and granted the new trial.

In granting the new trial, the trial judge summed up the evidence, in brief, as follows:

“The testimony in this case is that Schumacher slid into this intersection with his brakes locked at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Martin v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Berbells v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Delsman v. BertottiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Jamieson v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Guffey v. GaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  4. Gayson v. DaughertyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Radosevich v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API