Eggert v. Schumacher
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This appeal results from an order granting a new trial in a case growing out of an automobile collision, tried to the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the testimony for respondent, appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and moved for a nonsuit; which challenge and motion were granted. Later, upon motion for a new trial, the trial court reversed its decision and granted the new trial.
In granting the new trial, the trial judge summed up the evidence, in brief, as follows:
“The testimony in this case is that Schumacher slid into this intersection with his brakes locked at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Martin v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Berbells v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Delsman v. BertottiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Jamieson v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Guffey v. GaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
- Gayson v. DaughertyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Radosevich v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.