Legal Opinion
Hart v. Friedman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 27395PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and Opinion ■ sur Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Use Depositions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d) (3)
__(Document No. 13)_
And Now, November 21, 1961, after consideration of the foregoing Motion, the attached briefs of counsel, oral argument and the record, IT IS Ordered that Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave To Use Depositions Pursuant To Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 26(d) (3), 28 U.S.C.A. (Document No. 13) is Granted, without prejudice to defendant’s right to apply to the pre-trial judge and/or trial judge for modification of this order,
/s/ Francis L. Yan Dusen J.
Th…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- United States v. Maurice A. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Wright v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Weaver v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Duling v. MarkunCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce v. Shaklee Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1980
- Genevieve Derewecki, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph W. Derewecki, Deceased v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Derewecki v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Wilson v. Du PontDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Treharne v. CallahanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969