Wilson v. Du Pont
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This case is now before the court on defendant duPont’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Document No. 40) and plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To Amend the Complaint (Document No. 41).
The Complaint is based on a promissory judgment note dated April 9, 1959-(exhibit to Document No. 1), payable to the Farmers Bank of the State of Delaware, which was executed by C. D. Davis, the original plaintiff, and the defendants, duPont and Roszel.1 The Complaint states that the defendants, who are being sued individually and in a partnership capacity, have asserted to the holder *38of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Francis G. Bragen v. Hudson County News Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Mollie Krieger v. Ownership Corporation, a Corporation of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Kress, Dunlap & Lane, Ltd. v. Carlos A. Downing, as Commissioner of Property and Procurement, Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Stephens v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Snyder v. Dravo Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kness v. City of Kenosha, Wis.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987