Legal Opinion
De Bose v. Los Angeles Teachers Credit Union
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1957No. 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellee, 'plaintiff below, brought suit for the balance due on á promissory note and obtained judgment. The note read in part:
“1,825.00 Los Angeles, California
“July 2, 1953 * * *
“For Value Received, the undersigned jointly and/or severally promises to pay to Los Angeles Teachers Credit Union .at its office in Los Angeles, California, the principal sum of.Dollars. ‡ ■ sft ‡ % %
“This note is executed in conjunction with a loan on
“1952 Pontiac Delux 1,550.00
“Sig. 275.00
“Signatures:
“1. /s/ Walter L. DeBose Borrower
‡ ‡ jj< ‡ »
At trial defendant admitted that the signature…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hollen v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Baucom v. FriendDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Chestnut v. ChestnutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Bayside-Flushing Gardens, Inc. v. BeuermannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1941
- Love v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Namerdy v. GeneralcarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Millard v. Lorain Investment CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Sarbacher v. McNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989