Legal Opinion

Namerdy v. Generalcar

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1966No. 3763PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellee sued appellant for $1,112.88 allegedly due under a written agreement. At the trial before the court sitting without a jury, appellee introduced the deposition of one William Hoppen, an attorney retained by it to bring suit against appellant in New York. This deposition, with its accompanying exhibits, was the only evidence presented to the court. Appellant was represented by counsel but neither appellant nor any witness in his behalf attended the trial. After overruling appellant’s objections to the admission of the deposition and to certain portions of its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Tendler v. JaffeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Cranson v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Filson v. FountainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Petra International Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Simpson v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API