Legal Opinion

Love v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1916No. 7337PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from Irwin superior court—Judge Graham presiding. January 26, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

The note sued on was for the purchase-price of a horse, and expressly excluded any warranty by the vendor as to the age, health, life, or soundness of the property therein described, and further provided that, except the warranty of title, “no other warranty shall be implied as against the vendor." The court, therefore, did not err in striking the plea which attempted to set up the defense that the horse which was the consideration of the note did not measure up to the parol representations made by the seller at the time of the sale. All' such representations were necessarily merged into the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hotel Lanier Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Hollen v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Witty v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Chestnut v. ChestnutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Exchange Bank v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. JarrettDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1942
  2. De Bose v. Los Angeles Teachers Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Icard v. HarbuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Hogan v. BrogdonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API