Legal Opinion

Harford Agricultural & Breeder's Ass'n v. Puett Electrical Starting Gate Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1950No. 6074_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

Puett Electrical Starting Gate Corporation (hereinafter called Puett) instituted, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, a civil action against Harford Agricultural and Breeders’ Association (hereinafter called Harford) alleging that a starting gate for race horses used by Harford at Havre de Grace, Maryland, infringed patent No. 2,435,729 (hereinafter called the Whann patent) and patent No. 2,309,952 (hereinafter called the Harris patent). Both of these patents were owned by Puett. United Starting Gate Corporation (hereinafter called United),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Victor Cooler Door Co. v. Jamison Cold Storage Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  2. Wheeling Stamping Co. v. Standard Cap & Molding Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  3. Carl Braun, Inc. v. Kendall-Lamar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Thompson v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  5. Scott & Williams, Inc. v. WhisnantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Donner v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  3. Application of StanleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  4. Land v. Dollar Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce v. DollarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  5. Cassidy v. Puett Electrical Starting Gate Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API