Legal Opinion
James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 12, 2002No. Civ.A. No. 00-2509 (RMU)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Quash Service of Process; Denying Entry of Default Judgment; Granting the Non-Party’s Motion to Quash the Subpoena Duces Tecum
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises from a complaint filed by Aaron James (“the plaintiff’) alleging that his employer, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc. (“the defendant”), discriminated against him on the basis of his race. This court issued an order directing the defendant to show cause as to why default judgment should not be entered in light of the defendant’s failure to answer the allegations in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Luise Light v. Isabel WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- George J. Novak v. World BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Echostar Communications Corp. v. News Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Baade v. PriceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilson v. Prudential FinancialDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Canuto v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Beauregard v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Chien v. FreerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Maxon Engineering Services, Inc. v. Juan Mieses, et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.