Legal Opinion

Chien v. Freer

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 23, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2018-2050Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDREW CHIEN, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 18-2050 (CKK) RICHRAD J. FREER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (November 23, 2021) This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ [8] Motion to Dismiss. Defendants argue that the Court should dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and for improper service. Because the Court agrees that it lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendants, it GRANTS Defendants’ [8] Motion to Dismiss. I. BACKGROUND This is Plaintiff’s third case before the Court alleging various…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API