Legal Opinion
Canuto v. Carter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 10, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2282PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
Teresita Canuto, .proceeding pro se, has filed suit against two United States Army officers and various senior federal officials (collectively “federal defendants”) and the private entities DePauw HK Property Management (“DePauw”), Cirrus Asset Management, Inc. (“Cirrus”), and Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”). The gravamen of Ms. Canute’s complaint is that members of the United States armed forces have sexually assaulted her on a number of occasions after infiltrating her home and using sleeping gas to render her…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kent B. Crane v. New York Zoological SocietyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Second Amendment Foundation v. United States Conference of MayorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Gorman, David J. v. AmeriTrade Hold CorpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jewell v. Bestbus Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Akbar v. Interstate Realty Management CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- BERMUDEZ v. INTA-ROTO, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Canuto v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Dumitrascu v. DumitrascuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.