Legal Opinion
United States v. Ross
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided July 23, 1979No. 36,161; CM 436076PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Chief Judge:
The appellant was tried before a general court-martial composed of members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of larceny of a gold ring, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The sentence adjudged was dismissal from the service. The convening authority approved the sentence; the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence.
The following issue was granted for review by this Court:
DID THE ARMY COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW ERR IN HOLDING THAT IT WAS HARMLESS…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. GardinierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. PhinizyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. AlbaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. VelezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.