United States v. Velez
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a special court-martial composed of officer members of attempted sale of military property and wrongful appropriation of military property in violation of Articles 80 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880 and 921, respectively. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three months and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence.
It is alleged that “the military judge erred to the substantial prejudice of the appellant by admitting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ClarkeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. ElmoreU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. EarnestyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. PalumboU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. Specialist ELLIOT M. CARRASQUILLOArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013