Legal Opinion

State v. S.A.M.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 2017No. A15-0950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In 2005, appellant S.A.M. pleaded guilty to second-degree burglary, a felony offense. The district court stayed imposition of the sentence, and when S.A.M. was released from probation the conviction was deemed a misdemeanor under Minn. Stat. § 609.13, subd. 1(2) (2016). S.A.M. filed a petition for expungement in January 2015. The district court denied S.A.M.’s petition and the court of appeals affirmed. Because we conclude that felony convictions later deemed misdemeanors by operation of law under Minn. Stat. § 609.13, subd. 1(2), are not eligible for expungement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. In re the Welfare of J.J.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  2. State v. PriggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API