Legal Opinion
Sarachan & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Wilson & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 2, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, J.:
The plaintiff, the vendor, in two contracts for the sale of sewed burlap, has recovered a judgment for damages against the defendant, the vendee, for breach of such contracts on the vendee’s part. There were in all three nearly contemporaneous contracts between the parties, dated respectively, March 18, April 17 and April 24, 1918, the first for the sale of fifty, the second for the sale of two hundred and twenty-five (afterwards reduced by mutual agreement to seventy) and the third for the sale of twenty-five bales of sewed burlap. In the first the time of shipment was specified to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Thomas Gordon Malting Co. v. Bartels Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. F. S. Buffum Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reichbart v. Smith-Eisemann Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Tamargo v. S. Silberstein & Sons, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925