Legal Opinion

Tamargo v. S. Silberstein & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 14, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Proskauer, J.:

Defendant contracted to sell and plaintiff to buy certain voiles for export; delivery f. a. s. steamer New York. One thousand dollars was paid as a deposit by the buyer. The goods were not delivered and the buyer sues to recover back the deposit. Defendant resists on the ground that shipping instructions were never given to it.

In reversing a former judgment for plaintiff, Mr. Justice Dowling wrote (201 App. Div. 19): “ Under the complaint herein this action must be treated as one solely to recover back a deposit, and from that viewpoint it was incumbent upon the plaintiffs to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strasbourger v. . LeerburgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Giventer v. AntonofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Sarachan & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Wilson & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Sarachan & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Wilson & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Tamargo v. S. Silberstein & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API