Paul Hardeman, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Company
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EISELE, District Judge.
Background of Controversies *
Around 1960 the officials of a group of electric utility companies operating in some six states began looking into the possibility of a diversity interchange between the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and those utility companies. It was thought that this could be carried out through the construction of a network of extra-high voltage transmission lines (EHV) connecting the TVA system with the systems of the utility companies. Studies had indicated that the costs of the EHV facilities were sufficiently lower than the costs…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- In Re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- United States Ex Rel. Susi Contracting Co. v. Zara Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States ex rel. C.J.C., Inc. v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- The United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation and Sandia Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation, D/B/A Sandia National Laboratories, United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- the United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Fred Sanchez Construction Company v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Gillespie v. BD. OF ED. OF N. LITTLE ROCK, ETC.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1981
- Alaska International Construction, Inc. v. Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Alaska International Construction, Inc. v. Earth Movers of Fairbanks, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.