Legal Opinion
James v. Centex Construction Co.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided June 24, 1966No. LR-64-C-165PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENLEY, Chief Judge.
This is a suit in equity for rescission of a contract for the construction of certain sanitary and storm sewers in a residential subdivision in the City of New Orleans, Louisiana. The defendant denies that plaintiff is entitled to rescission and has filed a counterclaim against plaintiff and the surety on his performance bond seeking damages for alleged breach of contract by plaintiff.
Plaintiff, Worth James, is an individual citizen of Arkansas who does business under the name of Worth James Construction Co. Defendant, Centex Construction Co. (now Centex…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peerless Casualty Company v. Housing Authority of the City of Hazelhurst, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Reynolds v. Texarkana Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Frazer v. State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- United States v. Sabin Metal CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Saligman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Centex Construction Co., Inc. v. Worth James, D/B/A Worth James Construction Co., and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Gillespie v. BD. OF ED. OF N. LITTLE ROCK, ETC.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1981
- Paul Hardeman, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1974