Legal Opinion

Alfred E. Warren v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 1, 1965No. 19227PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented by this appeal questions the timeliness of appellant’s motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which- provides in part:

The [District] court may reduce a sentence * * * within 60 days after receipt by the court of a mandate issued upon, affirmance of the judgment or dismissal of the appeal,

The District Court dismissed appellant’s motion for lack of jurisdiction, holding that it had been filed too late. The facts relevant to this ruling are somewhat involved. Appellant pled guilty to a charge of robbery on August 16, 1963,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Boykin v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Heubel, Mario VitoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. State v. CorderIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. Gene A. BlantonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. BroadusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API