Legal Opinion
United States v. Heubel, Mario Vito
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 9, 1989No. 88-3548PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Senior Circuit Judge.
In this case we are presented with an appeal from the denial of what purports to be a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence filed by defendant-appellant, Mario Vito Heubel. First, we must decide whether we have jurisdiction to consider the appeal since, while Heubel’s original Rule 35(b) motion was filed within the 120 days after imposition of sentence allowed by the rule, the supplemental Rule 35(b) motion in which he first raised the issue he seeks to appeal was not. Second, if we find that we have…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States of America, Appellant/cross No. 88-3268 v. Alan Frank, A/K/A A. Roy, Appellee/cross No. 88-3220Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Frierson, JeromeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Nino, Victor. Appeal of Victor M. NinoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Gerald KressCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Martorano, George, A/K/A Cowboy. Appeal of George MartoranoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.