Legal Opinion
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 2, 2019No. 18-00160Published
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 19-103 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, CARGILL, INCORPORATED, AND TATE & LYLE AMERICAS LLC, Plaintiffs, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge Court No. 18-00160 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce’s final negative determination.] Dated: August 2, 2019 Patrick J. Togni and Stephen A. Jones, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Meen Geu Oh, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for Defendant. With him on the brief…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.